The Giants are averaging just 18.9 points per game this season and in 26 games under Garrett over the last two seasons they have topped 30 points only once.
It seemed clear this was the way Judge was headed after he telegraphed the move in his postgame news conference on Monday night. He seemed to be pointing his finger squarely at Garrett when he admitted he was as “frustrated” as his players with the offense, and said “We have too many good players and we have to put them in a better position to capitalize. That’s it.”
Asked specifically about Garrett, he said he had “faith” in everyone in the organization, but added “We’ll assess everything as a team and make any move we need to, going forward.” Asked if he was considering a change, Judge said, “We’ll stay off of that right now.”
By then, it was pretty clear, a change was already under consideration.
Given how terrible the Giants’ offense has been under Garrett, the only surprise is that it took this long, especially considering Judge and Garrett were an arranged marriage from the start. Giants co-owner John Mara wanted Garrett on staff even before Judge was hired before last season, team sources said back then, and made it clear Garrett had his support on the day Judge was hired. Judge and Garrett had no previous relationship, which makes Garrett and outlier considering Judge had obvious connections with almost every other coach on his staff.
Then last year, in Garrett’s first season, the Giants had the second-worst offense in the league, averaging just 17.5 points and 299.6 yards per game. That put Garrett on the hot seat at the end of the season, but he kept his job, according to a team source, mostly because the organization didn’t want young quarterback Daniel Jones to have to learn a third NFL offense in his third year.