In the end, the first phase of the Mets’ search was complicated not by a willingness to work for the Mets as much as by baseball’s rules about who a team can interview and when.
Industry chatter was that both Beane and Stearns were at least open-minded about the possibility of talking to Steve Cohen. As SNY reported, Cohen did speak to Theo Epstein, but neither saw a fit.
The Mets have not yet been formally denied permission to speak to Stearns, but that is the expected outcome. It was previously thought that Stearns had just one year remaining on his contract in Milwaukee, but it is now believed that the Brewers hold a vesting option on him for 2023.
While the terms of that option remain unconfirmed, it is enough to change the industry perception of the Mets’ leverage with Milwaukee. League sources say that Stearns would have been intrigued by the position, but Stearns himself did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
As for Beane, while he has told several friends in the industry that he was also intrigued by the Mets job, the current sense is that he is unlikely to leave Oakland. The questions about Beane had always been whether he wanted to run a team again on a more granular level, and whether he wanted to uproot himself and his young family.