This is an important offseason for the Giants. They wildly exceeded expectations in Joe Schoen's and Brian Daboll’s first year, setting unrealistic expectations for 2023. The step back was expected.
They’re headed into Year 3 now, though. That’s usually when, at the minimum, you see a team begin to turn the corner. Will that happen for New York this year? With a strong offseason, it should.
With that in mind, we figured it would be a good time to open the mailbag and address your concerns about the state of the Giants.
@AustinMatra: How will Evan Neal factor into the Giants' future plans?
He’s their right tackle … right now. I’d expect the Giants to actively look for his replacement this offseason, though. This could come in the first round of the draft (Notre Dame’s Joe Alt, Penn State’s Olu Fashanu) or free agency (Michael Onwenu, Jonah Williams, Jermaine Eluemunor). They’ll kick Neal inside once they find that player.
The Giants simply cannot continue to play Neal at tackle or go into next season expecting him to be their starting right tackle. He improved a little toward the end of the season before suffering a season-ending ankle injury, but there’s far more bad film than good.
Neal had a ProFootballFocus grade of 41.8 as a rookie. It dropped to 39.8 in Year 2. That’s not good. He allowed a pressure rate of 15.5 — fifth worst among offensive tackles. Remember Ereck Flowers? Giants fans loathed him. His ProFootballFocus grades during his three years with the Giants: 54.9, 69.4, 66.8.
The hope is that Neal can improve at guard. Granted, there are some worries. Neal flashed power in college, but not with his feet. He was on the ground often — problems that have continued in the NFL and could be amplified inside. Flowers, coincidentally, also kicked inside and found new life in the NFL as a result.
@GOATNYG: Do you think Joe Schoen and Brian Daboll’s confidence in Daniel Jones will rely on a restructure? If they restructure him it will be harder to move on in 2025. If they don’t, they can move on after this year.
The Giants made the right decision paying Jones. Let’s get that out of the way. The criticisms thrown their way for doing that are ridiculous. The Giants went 9-7-1 in 2022. They were not in a position to draft Bryce Young or C.J. Stroud as a result. Schoen was not in a position to trade up for either because of the number of holes elsewhere — he needed his picks. There was not a quarterback available in free agency (Derek Carr, Jimmy Garoppolo) who would have been a substantial improvement over Jones. By paying Jones, Schoen created the cap flexibility to round out the roster elsewhere.
The only thing you can rip Schoen for as it pertains to his quarterback is not picking up the fifth-year option. Even then, though: Did anyone see Jones playing that year like he did? He was varying degrees of awful his first three.
The conundrum facing the Giants is that the player they paid is not the player they now have. The injury red flags around Jones are very, very real. He’s now had two neck injuries and a torn ACL. You cannot look past that. You can’t commit to that in the short-or long-term.
The Giants can look to other places to create cap space if they need it. Restructuring Jones is not an option. They need to maintain that escape hatch after this year, where releasing Jones would free $19.3 million with a $22.2 million dead charge.