SNY's Ian Begley will be responding to and breaking down answers to Knicks questions from readers. Here's the latest...
What is the Knicks' plan for Evan Fournier? - @SleepyJ_
They are going to trade him, it’s just a matter of when and for whom. Fournier is making $18.8 million this season. That salary is valuable in many trades the Knicks could explore in the next three weeks. They could use it in a package to acquire Bruce Brown from Toronto. They could also package Quentin Grimes and Fournier to match salary for a top reserve like Portland’s Malcolm Brogdon or Charlotte’s Terry Rozier.
For what it’s worth: Rozier had not been at the top of the Knicks’ list entering the week. As of last weekend, the Knicks had not made a significant inquiry on Brogdon, either. Things can always change in the next three weeks. But Brown, I assume, will be near the top of the Knicks’ wish list if he becomes available.
If the Knicks don’t include Fournier in a deal prior to Feb. 8, they could simply decline his team option for 2024-25 and let him test free agency. Doing so would remove a valuable salary to use in potential trades. So the Knicks could decide to pick Fournier’s option up in order to include him in a trade in the 2024 offseason.
But holding onto Fournier until the summer has downstream implications. When teams treat players as trade filler and ignore the human aspect of the business, players notice. It can lead players and agents to view a front office in a negative light. Some executives don’t care about this element of business. If I had to guess, this factor is being weighed by the Knicks.
I’d guess they want to do the right thing for Fournier and trade him by the deadline if they have an adequate offer. He has been mostly out of the rotation for 13 months. Keeping him on ice for another two months so you can throw him in a trade makes sense from a cap perspective. But it could ultimately hurt the Knicks’ perception among players/agents.
QUICK HITTERS
What’s been the worst loss of the season? Home against the Cavs on 11/1? At Dallas (No Luka)? Home to the Magic (No Franz)? Off the board? - @DanStanczyk
I respect your pessimism, Dan. Road losses to Dallas and Utah come to mind. But I’d go with the loss to Orlando earlier this week since the Magic were missing Franz Wagner and Gary Harris. The Knicks played without Jalen Brunson but they held an 11-point lead late in the third and were outscored, 25-16, in the fourth quarter.
Do you think the Knicks would still acquire bench help if the only players available were expiring or had 2 or more years remaining? - @Mavrik2190
The Knicks are looking at players – like Brown – who would be on the roster in 2024-25. This would allow them to use that player’s salary for a trade in the 2024 offseason. But the Knicks aren’t limiting themselves to players under contract for next season. They have interest in at least one veteran player who will be a free agent in 2024.